Two stories are presented. The first story is about a clinical practit
ioner developing an assessment method beginning with a connection of t
est ''signs'' with behavior, and proceeding to a system that could mys
tify observers. The second story is about the application of scientifi
c methods to explain how the system could work. Together the stories a
re an example of practice informing science, and science informing pra
ctice. The basic hypothesis used is that much of what we call personal
ity is ''caused'' by differential aptitudes as modified by long-term l
earning. It is also assumed that people would prefer to use those apti
tudes they feel are their better ones and avoid those in which they fe
el weaker.