SUPPLEMENTAL SOCIAL-SERVICES IMPROVE OUTCOMES IN PUBLIC ADDICTION TREATMENT

Citation
At. Mclellan et al., SUPPLEMENTAL SOCIAL-SERVICES IMPROVE OUTCOMES IN PUBLIC ADDICTION TREATMENT, Addiction, 93(10), 1998, pp. 1489-1499
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Substance Abuse","Substance Abuse",Psychiatry
Journal title
ISSN journal
09652140
Volume
93
Issue
10
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1489 - 1499
Database
ISI
SICI code
0965-2140(1998)93:10<1489:SSIOIP>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Aims. To evaluate the effectiveness and value of social services added to standard addiction rehabilitation. Design. A controlled, quasi-exp erimental, field study with repeated measures. Setting. Conducted in t wo groups of publicly supported outpatient addiction treatment program s. Control programs provided standard, twice-weekly, outpatient group counseling. ''Enhanced'' programs provided standard counseling but als o case managers to coordinate and expedite use of pre-contracted medic al screenings, housing assistance, parenting classes and employment se rvices. Measurements. The Addiction Severity Index was used to record the nature and severity of patient problems in seven areas at treatmen t admission and at 6-month follow-up. Services provided during treatme nt were measured with the Treatment Services Review. Measures were tak en on consecutive samples of patients admitted to all programs-before enhancements (wave I, N = 431)-and at 12 months (wave 2, N = 710); and 26 months following enhancements (wave 3, N = 187). Findings. There w ere no significant differences in patient characteristics, treatment s ervices or 6-month outcomes of the two sets of programs in wave 1. Wav e 2 and especially wave 3 enhanced programs provided significantly mor e social and medical services than control programs. Patients treated in enhanced programs showed significantly less substance use, fewer ph ysical and mental health problems and better social function at 6-mont hs than Controls. Conclusions. Adding social services to public sector programs substantially improved the outcomes of addiction treatment. Changes in ''real world'' systems require time to implement; early eva luations may fail to capture the full impact of those changes,