The question of the influence of genes on behavior raises difficult ph
ilosophical and social issues. In this paper I delineate what I call t
he Developmentalist Challenge (DC) to assertions of genetic influence
on behavior, and then examine the DC through an in-depth analysis of t
he behavioral genetics of the nematode, C. elegans, with some briefer
references to work on Drosophila. I argue that eight ''rules'' relatin
g genes and behavior through environmentally-influenced and tangled ne
ural nets capture the results of developmental and behavioral studies
on the nematode. Some elements of the DC are found to be sound and oth
ers are criticized. The essay concludes by examining the relations of
this study to Kitcher's antireductionist arguments and Bechtel and Ric
hardson's decomposition and localization heuristics. Some implications
for human behavioral genetics are also briefly considered.