D. Laurent et al., RADIATION RENDERED MORE CYTOTOXIC BY FLUDARABINE MONOPHOSPHATE IN A HUMAN OROPHARYNX CARCINOMA CELL-LINE THAN IN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLASTS, Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 124(9), 1998, pp. 485-492
Purpose: Fludarabine monophosphate (fludarabine-P) is a relatively new
drug in the treatment of different haematological diseases. The mecha
nism of action also implies a possible role of this drug as a radiosen
sitizer. Up to now no in vitro investigations dealing with radiosensit
izing effects of fludarabine-P in carcinoma cell lines and fibroblasts
have been published. The aim of our studies was to analyse the cytoto
xic and radiosensitizing effects of different dosages and application
schedules of fludarabine-P in a human squamous carcinoma cell line of
the oropharynx (ZMK-1) and of fetal lung fibroblasts (MRC-5) in vitro.
Possible mechanisms of interaction of fludarabine-P and radiation wer
e investigated. Methods: ZMK-1 and MRC-5 cells were cultured under sta
ndard conditions with different concentrations of fludarabine-P in com
bination with escalating doses of radiation. Cytotoxic effects were me
asured by colony-forming assays. Induction and rejoining of radiation-
induced DNA double-strand breaks after incubation with fludarabine-P w
ere measured using constant-field gel electrophoresis. Incubation time
s for rejoining varied from 0 h to 24 h. Results: Fludarabine-P showed
a radiosensitizing activity in ZMK-1 tumour cells and MRC-5 fibroblas
ts. The observed effects depended on the concentration and the incubat
ion time. The largest effect was demonstrable for an incubation of 5 d
ays, which started shortly before irradiation, whereas an incubation s
olely before irradiation did not have a clear effect on the cellular s
urvival. The sensitizer enhancement ratio, at the 10% survival level,
in the ZMK-1 cells was 2.2 in comparison to 1.6 in MRC-5 cells. The an
alysis of the interaction of fludarabine-P and ionising radiation by m
eans of the isobologram approach, revealed an overadditive effect in t
he tumour cell line and an additive effect in the lung fibroblasts. Fl
udarabine-P did not modify the rejoining of radiation-induced DNA doub
le-strand breaks in either cell line. Conclusions: We conclude that fl
udarabine-P in clinically attainable doses is a strong radiosensitizer
in ZMK-1 cells and has a lower activity in the MRC-5 fibroblasts in v
itro. The radiosensitization of fludarabine-P seems to be over additiv
e in the malignant cells and additive in normal fetal fibroblasts. Thi
s would indicate that fludarabine-P might enhance the therapeutic rati
o of radiation. Further investigations are warranted to identify the p
otential of this drug as a radiosensitizer in vivo and to elucidate th
e mechanism of interaction of the drug and radiation.