Objective: To learn whether there was a defect in an attentional flood
light. We used a line decision task for which subjects had to decide i
f two line segments separated by a gap were one line or two parallel L
ines. We varied the area of the gap and, therefore, the area over whic
h subjects needed to spread attention to perform the task correctly. B
ackground: Visual tasks requiring focused attention use an attentional
spotlight. Other visual tasks requiring spatially distributed attenti
on may require a floodlight. Neglect after right hemisphere stroke can
be associated with a defect in the attentional spotlight. Results and
Conclusions: Two patients with neglect after right hemisphere stroke
performed more poorly than normal control subjects and left hemisphere
-damaged control subjects as the area of spread in the gap increased.
Right hemisphere-damaged patients did not differ from control subjects
' performance on another visuospatial parameter-the degree of disconti
nuity between the line segments. These results support a defective att
entional floodlight in neglect.