The slippery slope argument has been the mainstay of many of those opp
osed to the legalisation of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.
In this paper I re-examine the slippery slope in the light of two rec
ent studies that examined the prevalence of medical decisions concerni
ng the end of life in the Netherlands and in Australia. I argue that t
hese two studies have robbed the slippery slope of the source of its p
ower - its intuitive obviousness. Finally I propose that, contrary to
the warnings of the slippery slope, the available evidence suggests th
at the legalisation of physician-assisted suicide might actually decre
ase the prevalence of non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia.