Mm. Altaras et al., MICROHYSTEROSCOPY AND ENDOMETRIAL BIOPSY RESULTS FOLLOWING FAILED DIAGNOSTIC DILATATION AND CURETTAGE IN WOMEN WITH POSTMENOPAUSAL BLEEDING, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics, 42(3), 1993, pp. 255-260
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was twofold: firstly to evaluate and
compare the diagnostic precision of the microhysteroscopy (MH) and end
ometrial biopsy in a group of menopausal women in whom D&C had failed
to obtain an adequate endometrial sample, and secondly to quantitate t
he value of a hysteroscopy in determining endometrial sampling in thes
e patients. METHODS: A Hamou type II CO2 microhysteroscope (MH) was us
ed to evaluate the endocervical canal and the uterine cavity, followed
by endometrial sampling. RESULTS: Thirty-nine women were assessed usi
ng MH and endometrial biopsy. Histopathology results were available fo
r diagnosis in 29 of them (74.3%). In the remaining ten patients, the
MH diagnosis was atrophic endometrium. Biopsy results corroborated wit
h MH in 86.2% (25129) of the patients with tissue samples. The analysi
s (r) of this concordance rate was statistically significant (r = 0.96
). Sample results for patients with MH determined pathological and nor
mal endometrium corroborated in 83% and 91%, respectively, inclusive o
f three cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma. The sensitivity, specific
ity and predictive values for MH alone were 93.7%, 76.9% and 83.3%, re
spectively. CONCLUSIONS: These significant results are indicative that
this simplified endoscopic method surpasses all blind hospital or off
ice endometrial sampling methods. Therefore, we suggest that MH and en
dometrial sampling should be the initial assessment tool for any type
of indication requiring endometrial and uterine cavity assessment.