The current clinical trials model for antidepressants (AD) was develop
ed in the 1960s. It views major depression as a unitary disorder, and
''antidepressants'' as having illness-specific therapeutic actions. Th
e established efficacy measures are the Hamilton symptom rating scale
and the CGI, which provide summary measures of improvement. In contras
t, the DSM IV defines depression as heterogeneous, with such broad cla
sses as unipolar and bipolar showing different response to treatments.
Research further indicates depression to be comprised of major affect
ive and behavioral components which vary in intensity across patients,
and the tricyclic ADs to have multiple actions that affect various co
mponents sequentially. ''New'' ADs, products of rapid advancements in
the neurosciences, are more precise in their actions on brain monoamin
e systems, targeted to affect behaviors with greater specificity. A ne
w trials model sensitive to the varied behavioral effects needs to be
developed to adapt to these quicker acting, targeted antidepressants.
A componential model is recommended that employs an array of behaviora
l methods, and subtype classification and statistical approaches to es
timate onset and sequence of multiple drug actions. The NIMH can inter
vene to accelerate improvements by initiating funding programs to impl
ement move effective clinical methods and models. (C) 1998 American Co
llege of Neuropsychopharmacology. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.