Wr. Hersh et Dh. Hickam, HOW WELL DO PHYSICIANS USE ELECTRONIC INFORMATION-RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS -A FRAMEWORK FOR INVESTIGATION AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 280(15), 1998, pp. 1347-1352
Objective.-Despite the proliferation of electronic information retriev
al (IR) systems for physicians, their effectiveness has not been well
assessed. The purpose of this review is to provide a conceptual framew
ork and to apply the results of previous studies to this framework. Da
ta Sources.-All sources of medical informatics and information science
literature, including MEDLINE, along with bibliographies of textbooks
in these areas, were searched from 1966 to January 1998. Study Select
ion.-All articles presenting either classifications of evaluation stud
ies or their results, with an emphasis on those studying use by physic
ians. Data Extraction.-A framework for evaluation was developed, consi
sting of frequency of use, purpose of use, user satisfaction, searchin
g utility, search failure, and outcomes. All studies were then assesse
d based on the framework. Data Synthesis.-Due to the heterogeneity and
simplistic study designs, no meta-analysis of studies could be done.
General conclusions were drawn from data where appropriate. A total of
47 articles were found to include an evaluation component and were us
ed to develop the framework. Of these, 21 articles met the inclusion c
riteria for 1 or more of the categories in the framework. Most use of
IR systems by physicians still occurs with bibliographic rather than f
ull-text databases. Overall use of IR systems occurs just 0.3 to 9 tim
es per physician per month, whereas physicians have 2 unanswered quest
ions for every 3 patients. Conclusions.-Studies comparing IR systems w
ith different searching features have not shown that advanced searchin
g methods are significantly more effective than simple text word metho
ds. Most searches retrieve only one fourth to one half of the relevant
articles on a given topic and, once retrieved, little is known about
how these articles are interpreted or applied. These studies imply tha
t further research and development are needed to improve system utilit
y and performance.