E. Mor et al., TREATMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA ASSOCIATED WITH CIRRHOSIS IN THE ERA OF LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION, Annals of internal medicine, 129(8), 1998, pp. 643-653
Purpose: To review the treatment of cirrhotic patients with hepatocell
ular carcinoma in the era of liver transplantation and to determine th
e most appropriate approach to the treatment of patients at different
stages of disease. Data Sources: A MEDLINE search of English-language
articles published between 1981 and 1997 and the clinical experience o
f the Mount Sinai Liver Transplant Program. Study Selection: Selected
studies were 1) original articles reporting results of resection and t
ransplantation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhot
ic patients and 2) initial reports from major transplantation centers
of multimethod therapies combining chemotherapy with transplantation.
Data Extraction: Study designs were assessed with careful attention to
methods and aims. Relevant data on patient population, tumor stage di
stribution, treatment, survival, and rate of recurrent disease were ex
tracted and analyzed. Data Synthesis: Options for the treatment of hep
atocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients vary according to tumor st
age and severity of underlying liver disease. Resection remains an imp
ortant method primarily in eastern countries, where the screening of h
igh-risk populations has been associated with early detection of small
asymptomatic lesions. Long-term survival after resection, how ever, i
s low. In western countries, liver transplantation is becoming the tre
atment of choice in patients with advanced cirrhosis and small, unrese
ctable lesions; resection is reserved for cirrhotic patients with smal
l, peripheral lesions and preserved hepatic function. Minimally invasi
ve procedures (such as percutaneous ethanol injection and transarteria
l chemoembolization) have been developed to treat unresectable tumors.
Transarterial chemoembolitation may also be effective in patients wit
h advanced cirrhosis and unresectable lesions who are awaiting transpl
antation. Conclusions: The efficacy of liver transplantation for hepat
ocellular carcinoma has been proven mainly in patients with advanced c
irrhosis and small lesions. Future studies may clarify the role of app
roaches combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with transplantation for la
rge (stage III) tumors.