A SURVEY OF SOFTWARE REUSE LIBRARIES

Citation
A. Mili et al., A SURVEY OF SOFTWARE REUSE LIBRARIES, ANNALS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 5, 1998, pp. 349-414
Citations number
129
Categorie Soggetti
Computer Science Software Graphycs Programming","Computer Science Software Graphycs Programming
ISSN journal
10227091
Volume
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
349 - 414
Database
ISI
SICI code
1022-7091(1998)5:<349:ASOSRL>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The study of storage and retrieval methods of software assets in softw are libraries gives rise to a number of paradoxes: While this subject has been under investigation for nearly two decades, it still remains an active area of research in software reuse and software engineering; this can be explained by the observation that new technologies (such as the internet, the world wide web, object-oriented programming) keep opening new opportunities for better asset packaging, better library organizations, and larger scale libraries - thereby posing new technic al challenges. Also, while many sophisticated solutions have been prop osed to this problem, the state of the practice in software reuse is c haracterized by the use of ad-hoc, low-tech methods; this can be expla ined by the observation that most existing solutions are either too in effective to be useful or too intractable to be usable. Finally, while it is difficult to imagine a successful software reuse program withou t a sophisticated, well-tuned, systematic procedure for software compo nent storage and retrieval, it seems many successful software reuse ex periments rely on trivial methods of component storage and retrieval; this can be explained by the observation that, in the current state of the practice, software libraries are not the bottleneck of the softwa re reuse process. This paper presents a survey of methods of storage a nd retrieval of software assets in software libraries. In addition to a review of existing research efforts, the paper makes two contributio ns. First, a definition of (presumably) orthogonal attributes of stora ge and retrieval methods; these attributes are used, in turn, to class ify existing methods into six broad classes. Second, a definition of ( presumably) orthogonal assessment criteria, which include technical, m anagerial and human factors; these criteria afford us an exhaustive an d uniform basis for assessing and comparing individual methods and cla sses of methods.