IS MALE-FERTILITY REALLY DECLINING

Citation
D. Marmor et al., IS MALE-FERTILITY REALLY DECLINING, La Presse medicale, 27(29), 1998, pp. 1484-1490
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
07554982
Volume
27
Issue
29
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1484 - 1490
Database
ISI
SICI code
0755-4982(1998)27:29<1484:IMRD>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
In 1992, a statistical analysis of data from 61 studies of semen quali ty among normal men led to the conclusion that human sperm count fell of 40% from 1940 to 1990. This meta-analysis has since been invalidate d for methodological reasons as well as for statistical reasons, but i t caused enormous concern to both the scientific community and to the international media. A decline of human fertility was speculated. To d ate, the most popular hypothesis offered to explain this alleged decli ne has been increasing exposure to environmental estrogen mimicking ch emicals. However, there is no evidence that male or mammal fertility i s declining. Moreover, the sperm count of breeding mammals did not dec lined in the meanwhile. Since 1992, numerous papers reported on men in vestigated during the last 20 years have shown conflicting results, fr om sperm count improvement to sperm count decline. However, several pu blications included methodological and analytical biases. In fact, the techniques used for semen analysis have to be questioned. It is a sub jective exam, lacking laboratory standards and quality control procedu res. This induces very important variations between laboratories and b etween biologists. For the sperm count itself numerous errors can occu r, provoked by the technique,the equipment and the reader: for the sam e sperm, the coefficient of Variation can exceed 40% between two techn icians. Therefore, the current techniques of semen analysis cannot war rant epidemiological studies. It is indispensable to admit the limits of the semen analysis in order to improve as much as possible its qual ity and its reliability.