THE WAR AGAINST JUNK SCIENCE - THE USE OF EXPERT PANELS IN COMPLEX MEDICAL-LEGAL SCIENTIFIC LITIGATION

In the legal context, junk science is defined as evidence that is outs ide of mainstream scientific or medical views. Junk science does not h ave indicia of reliability and is not generally accepted. Despite the lack of scientific reliability, US courts, expert witnesses and juries are increasingly reliant on junk science in making causation decision s in complex medical liability cases. Courts have accepted junk scienc e even where reliable scientific evidence is available. The United Sta tes silicone gel breast implant litigation is a prime example of this phenomenon. The issue of whether silicone breast implants are associat ed with disease has been a controversial subject for scientists and ph ysicians, an emotional issue for women who have breast implants, and a lucrative business for the lawyers and expert witnesses who are the p roponents of junk science. Junk science has provided to juries a quick and convenient explanation for claimed diseases or syndromes which ha ve required years for reliable scientists to conclude are not related to breast implants. The breast implant litigation highlights the often dramatic difference between decisions based upon junk science and dec isions grounded in scientific method, fact and reality. Recently, judg es involved in the breast implant litigation have become concerned abo ut the use of junk science in light of the growing body of legitimate scientific evidence that breast implants do not cause disease. Several judges have been motivated to take the unique and novel approach of c onvening scientific panels of independent experts to study the scienti fic issues and make findings to the court. Through the use of independ ent scientific experts, several judges have meaningfully assessed the evidence that the litigants present and have prevented or strictly lim ited the use of junk science in the courtroom. Using this procedure, o ther judges are weighing the evidence for future cases. This paper wil l briefly explore the background of mass tort medical products litigat ion and the development of junk science. The paper will then focus on the history of the breast implant litigation and the steps that the co urts have already taken to combat junk science, including the use of s cientific panels. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.