Clinical supervision has always been important, but latterly the heigh
tened demands for more trainees, effective continuing professional dev
elopment, quality services and accreditation make it a topic for serio
us scrutiny. The present paper summarizes the structures, processes an
d outcomes that 10 NHS professions use to respond to this demand in re
lation to initial professional training. It does this by placing them
in the context of the professional debate on balancing the traditional
emphasis on supervision quality with the increasing quantity of those
requiring supervision. The findings, based on scrutiny of each profes
sion's placement and supervision documentation, indicate significant v
ariability in the quality standards between the professions. Implicati
ons are drawn for reconstructing clinical supervision, based on the li
terature and a composite of the best quality standards in the professi
ons. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.