It is argued that changes in workers' budget sets cannot explain the d
ramatic increases in civilian work in the United States during World W
ar II. Although money wages grew during the period, wartime after-tax
real wages were lower than either before or after the war. Evidence fr
om the 1940s also appears to be inconsistent with other pecuniary expl
anations such as wealth effects of government policies, intertemporal
substitution induced by asset prices, unfulfilled expectations, and ch
anges in the nonmarket price of time. Although untested and relatively
undeveloped, nonpecuniary models of behavior are tempting explanation
s for wartime work.