The aim of this study was to measure attitudes to health care prioriti
zation in various Finnish population groups. Three study groups were e
stablished: I) the general public (n=4260); 2) politicians (n=1427); a
nd 3) medical and social work professionals (n=1055). The following ba
ckground data were obtained: sex, year of birth, marital status, numbe
r of children, education, profession, personal income, self-perceived
health, and how subjects viewed their own future and whether they were
satisfied with their lives. Information on activities involving prior
itization of health service was elicited by presenting a list of 16 he
alth care activities. Respondents evaluated these activities as 1) mor
e important than average, 2) of average importance, or 3) less importa
nt than average (indicated as numbers 1-3). The response rate was 59.3
%, and 57.2% (n=3858) of the original sample was accepted for analysis
. The politicians and profes-sionals showed almost identical attitudes
. All groups prioritized treatment of life-threatening diseases among
children. The general public prioritized high-tech surgery more highly
than professionals or politicians. Alternative medicine and cosmetic
surgery were the two least important activities. All groups agreed abo
ut prioritization of serious diseases among children, care of dying pa
tients, prevention, surgery which helps people to perform their everyd
ay tasks, and home care for the disabled elderly. Professionals and po
liticians prioritized mental health more highly than the population. T
he general public prioritized intensive care for premature babies with
a low birth weight (less than 800 g). Professionals prioritized famil
y planning more highly than politicians and the population. The result
s resemble those obtained in Britain, indicating that attitudes toward
s priorities in health are similar between Britain and Finland, and th
at the respondents' professions determine attitudes more strongly than
does cultural background.