Narrative therapy has been associated with the assumptions of postmode
rnism and social constructionism; both of which support the notion tha
t there are no truths, just points of view. Thus, narrative therapists
have sought to privilege the voices of their clients in the process o
f delivering them fi om the oppressive weight of dominant, cultural gr
and narratives. Have they been as willing and adept at respecting the
voices of other professionals, and their colleagues within the narrati
ve camp? This question is discussed in relation to the underlying assu
mptions that inform narrative practice. It is concluded that narrative
has perhaps unwittingly fallen prey to the human tendency to reify me
taphors and make gurus of leaders.