Z. Guzel et al., A COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY OF THE ESOPHAGUS - WORK-IN-PROGRESS, British journal of radiology, 71(850), 1998, pp. 1076-1082
A retrospective treatment planning study was carried out in five patie
nts to assess the effectiveness of conformal radiotherapy of the oesop
hagus. A two-phase conventional treatment plan was created for each pa
tient, with a prescribed dose of 55 Gy. This plan was compared with a
single-phase conformal plan consisting of the same held arrangement as
the second phase of the conventional treatment, but with conformal bl
ocks shaped to the beam's eye view of the planning target volume. A fu
rther comparison was made between the conventional plan and a two-phas
e plan using the same beam angles and weights as the conventional plan
, but with conformal field shapes. The effectiveness of each treatment
plan was assessed using dose-volume histograms and normal tissue comp
lication probabilities for the lungs. On average, the single-phase con
formal technique increased the mean lung dose from 22.5% (+/-6.2 SD) o
f the prescribed dose to 29.5% (+/- 5.2 SD) compared with the conventi
onal technique (p = 0.0001). This indicates that this technique did no
t offer any benefit in terms of reducing the risk of pneumonitis. Howe
ver, the two-phase conformal technique reduced the mean lung dose from
22.5% (+/- 6.2 SD) of the prescribed dose to 19.8% (+/-4.6 SD) (p = 0
.03), showing that this technique should reduce the risk of pneumoniti
s. Further work is underway to study more patients and to investigate
tumour control probability and dose escalation.