Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of u
tilization of native medicine and the reasons for using it. Methods: A
cross-sectional study of all persons attending the seven primary heal
th care centers in Arar city (i.e. consumers) was conducted. A 20% sys
tematic random sample of consumers was selected from each center givin
g a total sample of 2320. Consumers were interviewed by trained physic
ians using a structured questionnaire. Results: A total of 554 (23.9%)
consumers reported use of any type of native medicine during the last
six months. Herbs were the most common type of native medicine used (
about 29 types were used). Cautery and the consultation of traditional
bone setters were still being used. Native medicine was mainly used f
or treating gastrointestinal diseases (5.8%), for failure of modern me
dicine to treat disease (5.0%) and for treating body aches, fatigabili
ty and joint pains (4.9%). Conclusion: The study showed a high prevale
nce of use of native medicine by primary health care consumers in Arar
area. Some forms of harmful native medicines were still being used. C
ommunity health education about benefits and harmful effects of native
medicine is needed. Continuing medical education for health team memb
ers at the primary health care level is recommended.