COMPARISON OF THE QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA-2.0 ASSAY WITH THE AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR-1.0 ASSAY FOR QUANTITATION OF LEVELS OF HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS TYPE-1 RNA IN PLASMA OF PATIENTS RECEIVING STAVUDINE-DIDANOSINE COMBINATION THERAPY
M. Segondy et al., COMPARISON OF THE QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA-2.0 ASSAY WITH THE AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR-1.0 ASSAY FOR QUANTITATION OF LEVELS OF HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS TYPE-1 RNA IN PLASMA OF PATIENTS RECEIVING STAVUDINE-DIDANOSINE COMBINATION THERAPY, Journal of clinical microbiology (Print), 36(11), 1998, pp. 3392-3395
We compared the QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 assay with the AMPLICOR HIV-1
MONITOR 1.0 assay for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus ty
pe 1 (HIV-1) RNA in plasma in the Stadi trail, which evaluated a stavu
dine plus didanosine combination therapy in 52 patients. HIV-1 RNA bas
eline values measured with AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 were significant
ly higher than those measured with QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0, and decre
ases in HIV-1 RNA levels from baseline were also found to be significa
ntly higher when measured with the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 assay. T
he frequency of HIV-1 RNA levels below the lower limit of quantitation
was significantly higher with QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 than with AMPL
ICOR HIV-I MONITOR 1.0. Reanalysis of these results by an ultrasensiti
ve procedure of AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 or by a modified version of
the test that included additional primers adapted for non-B HIV-1 cla
des yielded greater differences between the QUANTIPLEX HIV-1 RNA 2.0 a
ssay and the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR 1.0 assay. Our results indicate th
at a valid comparison of the virological efficacies obtained with diff
erent antiretroviral drug regimens requires the use of the same viral
load quantitation procedure; further standardization between the diffe
rent HIV-1 RNA quantitation kits is therefore needed.