THE EFFECT OF EXERCISE ON ISCHEMIC MITRAL REGURGITATION

Citation
J. Peteiro et al., THE EFFECT OF EXERCISE ON ISCHEMIC MITRAL REGURGITATION, Chest, 114(4), 1998, pp. 1075-1082
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ChestACNP
ISSN journal
00123692
Volume
114
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1075 - 1082
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3692(1998)114:4<1075:TEOEOI>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of dynamic exercise on mitral regur gitation (MR) as assessed by color flow Doppler imaging and tested the hypothesis that MR increases in patients with left ventricular (LV) f unction worsening during exercise. We studied 513 patients (390 men, 1 23 women:mean age [+/-1 SD] 58+/-11 years) referred for treadmill exer cise echocardiography (EE) to evaluate known or suspected coronary art ery disease. Normal EE was seen in 182 (36%), necrosis in 131 (25%), a nd ischemic response (with or without necrosis) in 200 (39%). MR asses sment was performed at rest and immediately postexercise, on the basis of the mosaic area. At rest, mild MR (<3 cm(2)) was seen in 138; mode rate (3 to 6 cm(2)) was seen in 21; and severe (>6 cm(2)) was seen in 5. Forty-two patients developed new, mild (n=35), moderate (n=6), or s evere (n=1) MR during exercise. Patients were assigned to three groups : group 1-new or increased MR from rest to exercise (n=70); group 2-MR at rest unchanged or decreased (n=136); and group 3-no MR at rest and exercise (n=307). At rest, LV ejection fraction (EF) and wall motion score index (WMSI) were similar in group 1 and group 2 but improved in group 3 (EF: group 1, 51+/-11%; group 2, 53+/-10%; group 3, 56+/-8%, p<0.001 vs group 1 and group 2. WMSI: group 1, 1.3+/-0.3; group 2, 1.3 +/-0.4; group 3, 1.1+/-0.2, p<0.01 vs group 1, p<0.001 vs group 2). At exercise, EF and WMSI were impaired in group 1 (EF: group 1, 52+/-14% ; group 2, 58+/-15%; group 3, 64+/-11%, p<0.001 vs group 1 and group 2 ; p<0.05 between group 1 and group 2. WMSI: group 1, 1.5+/-0.4; group 2, 1.4+/-0.4; group 3, 1.2+/-0.3, p<0.001 vs group 1 and group 2, p<0. 05 between group 1 and group 2). An ischemic response was common in gr oup 1 (67% vs 35% in group 2 and 34% in group 3, p<0.001 between group 1 and group 3 and between group 1 and group 2). Accordingly, in group 1 patients, exercise time was diminished (7.3+/-2.7 vs 8.4+/-2.7 in g roup 2 and 9.3+/-2.4 in group 3, p<0.01, between group 1 and group 2, p<0.001 between group 1 and group 3, p<0.001 between group 2 and group 3) and the number of severely narrowed coronary vessels greater (2.4/-0.9 vs 1.7+/-1.0 in group 2 and 1.7+/-1.0 in group 3). In conclusion , MR does not increase in most patients submitted to dynamic exercise echocardiography. However, if MR develops, severe LV function worsenin g should be suspected.