Tr. Humphreys et al., TREATMENT OF SUPERFICIAL BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA AND SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA IN-SITU WITH A HIGH-ENERGY PULSED CARBON-DIOXIDE LASER, Archives of dermatology, 134(10), 1998, pp. 1247-1252
Background: High-energy pulsed carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers have been u
sed extensively to resurface wrinkled and photodamaged skin with a low
risk of scarring. Results of histological studies demonstrate precise
ablation depths in treated skin with minimal thermal damage to underl
ying tissue. Our objective was to determine if a pulsed CO2 laser coul
d effectively ablate superficial malignant cutaneous neoplasms (superf
icial multifocal basal cell carcinoma [BCC] and squamous cell carcinom
a [SCC] in situ). Observations: Thirty superficial neoplasms (17 BCCs
and 13 SCCs) and their surrounding 3-mm. margins were treated with eit
her 2 or 3 passes of a pulsed CO2 laser (500 mJ, 2-4 W) using a 3-mm c
ollimated handpiece; The treated areas were subsequently excised and e
valuated histologically by serial sectioning at 5-mu m intervals for r
esidual tumor at the deep and lateral margins. Average patient age was
greater for those with SCCs than for those with BCCs (76.5 vs 56.7 ye
ars; P = .001). The average tumor thickness of SCC in situ was signifi
cantly greater than that of superficial BCC (0.57 vs 0.34 mm; P = .01)
. All (9 of 9 patients) BCCs were completely ablated with 3 passes, an
d residual tumor in the deep margins was seen in 5 of 8 patients treat
ed with 2 passes of the pulsed CO2 laser (P = .005) incomplete vaporiz
ation of the SCC depth was seen in 3 of 7 patients treated with 3 pass
es and in 2 of 6 patients treated with 2 passes. Those SCCs incomplete
ly treated were significantly thicker than those completely ablated (0
.65 vs 0.41 mm; P = .01). Positive lateral margins were seen in 1 BCC
and 3 SCC specimens. Conclusions: Pulsed CO2 laser treatment can be ef
fective in ablating superficial BCC. Treatment of the neoplasm and a m
inimum of dr-mm margins with 3 passes (500. mJ, 2-4 tit) is recommende
d for complete vaporization using this laser system. Because 3 passes
did not completely ablate all SCC in situ, use of this modality alone
is not recommended for treatment of thick or keratotic lesions. No dir
ect comparison of efficacy can be made with other destructive modaliti
es that have not been evaluated with comparably sensitive histological
techniques. Further study is needed to establish any cosmetic advanta
ge of pulsed CO2 lasers over other destructive modalities for treatmen
t of superficial malignant neoplasms and long-term cure rates.