The relationships of distributive justice norms (equity, equality, and
need), social role, and demographic variables to judgments of fairnes
s, satisfaction, employer obligation, and employee entitlement were in
vestigated. Subjects functioning as recipient's coworkers, allocators,
or observers responded to a need-based salary allocation situation. M
ultiple regression analyses showed that endorsement of the need norm w
as most important. Justice norms and demographics each predicted signi
ficant unique variance in all of the criterion judgments. Social role
yielded significant differences for fairness judgments. The findings i
ndicate that where a situation increases the salience of nonequity fac
tors other justice norms, such as recipient needs, may become more imp
ortant than the equity norm. The results also suggest the importance o
f respondent social roles and demographic characteristics in the study
of justice judgments.