Ke. Sickafus et al., A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE IRRADIATION DAMAGE RESPONSE OF SPINEL AND ZIRCONIA DUE TO XE ION-BOMBARDMENT, Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials: properties, microstructure and processing, 253(1-2), 1998, pp. 78-85
The mechanical properties of Xe-implanted spinel and cubic zirconia su
rfaces, as determined by nano-indentation measurements, are distinct a
nd the differences can be related to their microstructures. Upon Xe2ion irradiation to high dose at cryogenic temperature (120 K), the You
ng's modulus of irradiated spinel falls dramatically until the modulus
is only about 3/4 the un-irradiated value. The maximum modulus occurs
concurrent with the formation of a metastable crystalline phase of sp
inel. The subsequent elastic softening at higher Xe2+ doses is an indi
cation of the onset of amorphization of the spinel. Xe-implanted zirco
nia surfaces behave differently, in all cases showing almost no change
in elastic modulus with increasing Xe2+ ion dose. This is consistent
with microstructural observations of Xe-implanted zirconia crystals wh
ich, unlike spinel, show no change in crystal structure with increasin
g ion dose. The hardness of both spinel and zirconia increases slightl
y for low Xe2+ ion doses. At higher doses, zirconia shows little chang
e in hardness, while the hardness of the implanted spinel falls by mor
e than a factor of two. The initial increase in hardness of both spine
l and zirconia is consistent with point defect accumulation and the pr
ecipitation of small interstitial clusters, while the drop in hardness
of spinel at high Xe2+ ion doses is due to the formation of an amorph
ous phase. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.