Fluoride is an effective anabolic agent to increase spinal bone densit
y by increasing bone formation, and at therapeutically relevant (i.e.,
micromolar) concentrations, it stimulates bone cell proliferation and
activities in vitro and in vivo. However, the fluoride therapy of ost
eoporosis has been controversial, in large part because of a lack of c
onsistent antifracture efficacy. However, information regarding the mo
lecules mechanism of action of fluoride may improve its optimum and co
rrect usage and may disclose potential targets for the development of
new second generation drugs that might have a better efficacy and safe
ty profile. Accordingly, this review will address the molecular mechan
isms of the osteogenic action of fluoride. In this regard, we and othe
r workers have proposed two competing models, both of which involve th
e mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) mitogenic signal transductio
n pathway. Our model involves a fluoride inhibition of a unique fluori
de-sensitive phosphotyrosine phosphatase (PTP) in osteoblasts, which r
esults in a sustained increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation level o
f the key signaling proteins of the MAPK mitogenic transduction pathwa
y, leading to the potentiation of the bone cell proliferation initiate
d by growth factors. The competing model proposes that fluoride acts i
n coordination with aluminum to form fluoroaluminate, which activates
a pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi/o protein on bone cell membrane, leadin
g to an activation of cellular protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs), which
in turn leads to increases in the tyrosine phosphorylation of signalin
g proteins of the MAPK mitogenic signal transduction pathway, ultimate
ly leading to a stimulation of cell proliferation. A benefit of our mo
del, but not the other model, is that it accounts for all the unique p
roperties of the osteogenic action of fluoride. These include the low
effective fluoride dose, the skeletal tissue specificity, the requirem
ent of PTK-activating growth factors, the sensitivity to changes in me
dium phosphate concentration, the preference for undifferentiated oste
oblasts, and the involvement of the MAPK. Unlike fluoride, the mitogen
ic action of fluoroaluminate is not specific for skeletal cells. Moreo
ver, the mitogenic action of fluoroaluminate shows several important,
different characteristics than that of fluoride. Thus, it is likely th
at our model of a fluoride-sensitive PTP represents the actual molecul
ar mechanism of the osteogenic action of fluoride.