R. Craine, MATCHING THE MOMENTS - A TEST OF 3 REPRESENTATIVE AGENT MODELS, International Journal of Systems Science, 29(11), 1998, pp. 1179-1188
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Computer Science Theory & Methods","Operatione Research & Management Science","Computer Science Theory & Methods","Operatione Research & Management Science","Robotics & Automatic Control
No arbitrage profit opportunities implies state-contingent shadow pric
es that value the state-contingent payoffs of any asset traded in perf
ect markets. The shadow price is an implicit stochastic discount facto
r. I decompose the implicit model free nominal discount factor into it
s observable conditional mean-the price of a default free discount bon
d-and an unobservable innovation. I infer the unconditional covariance
matrix between innovations in the model free discount factor and retu
rns. Dynamic behaviour nl economic models specify, or imply, a discoun
t factor. The theoretical mean of the nominal model generated discount
factor is the observable price of a default free discount bond. A nec
essary condition for any model to be consistent with securities market
data is that the moments of the deviations of the model-generated dis
count factor from its theoretical conditional mean (call the deviation
s residuals) match the moments of innovations in the model free discou
nt factor. This is an easy specification test for any model. I match t
he moments for three representative agent specifications-power utility
, habit formation, and a consumption-leisure choice model. The moments
from the more complicated specifications come closes to matching the
model free moments, but none of the representative agent models genera
tes a covariance (risk premium) large enough to match the model free c
ovariance.