This article presents evidence strengthening the argument against comp
arison group strategies given the current state of knowledge. The comp
arison group for this study was drawn explicitly recognizing the self-
selection issues. It drew youths from similar sources matched on attit
udes related to California Conservation Corps (CCC) participation not
usually measured and collected information explicitly designed to impr
ove the statistical modeling of participation. Yet, as always, whether
a comparison group strategy works is an empirical question. One belie
ves the results from such a study only if they basically conform to on
e's prior beliefs, otherwise the suitability of a comparison group is
suspect.