Jg. Woodworth et al., EVALUATION OF BIOMARKERS FOR EXPOSURE OF FISH TO EUCALYPT-BASED PULP-MILL EFFLUENT AND FOR DETERMINATION OF ROUTES OF EXPOSURE, Environmental toxicology and water quality (Print), 13(4), 1998, pp. 285-296
Biomarkers have been used extensively to assess the impacts of pine-ba
sed pulp mill effluent on fish species in the Northern Hemisphere; how
ever, little research has been performed to evaluate the use of biomar
kers to assess the effects of eucalypt-based pulp mill effluent. Conse
quently, this series of experiments had two aims: to evaluate (1) the
use of biomarkers for detecting exposure to eucalypt-based pulp mill e
ffluent and (2) the use of biomarkers to determine the significance of
the route of exposure. To determine the effects of eucalypt-based pul
p mill effluent in the receiving water the contribution of dietary exp
osure was measured, both alone and in conjunction with water column ex
posure. Common jollytails (Galaxias maculatus) and Tasmanian blennies
(Parablennius tasmanianus) were exposed to low levels (0.5-1%) of pulp
mill effluent via the food chain, or via the water column or combined
food chain and water column. Selected biomarkers were used to detect
any sublethal effects caused by exposure to the effluent. Results obta
ined indicated that eucalypt-based pulp mill effluent had a minor effe
ct on fish at concentrations that are found in the receiving water. Fi
sh exposed by both routes showed minimal changes in liver structure an
d ultrastructure, a three- to fourfold increase in ethoxyresorufin-O-d
eethylase (EROD) activity, and no detectable induction of cytochrome P
4501A1. EROD induction, histopathology, and ultrastructure of the live
r were proven to be useful biomarkers for the detection of exposure to
low levels of eucalypt-based pulp mill effluent. Further, the results
obtained from that series of bioassays have implications in relation
to the methodologies used for assessing the effects of any complex eff
luent. By exposing the fish to the effluent by only one route, the imp
acts of the effluent may be underestimated in many instances. (C) 1998
by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.