NORMAL VALUES FOR AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CASUAL BLOOD-PRESSURE AND AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE - RESULTS FROM A DANISH POPULATION SURVEY
Sl. Rasmussen et al., NORMAL VALUES FOR AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CASUAL BLOOD-PRESSURE AND AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE - RESULTS FROM A DANISH POPULATION SURVEY, Journal of hypertension, 16(10), 1998, pp. 1415-1424
Objective To determine normal values for 24 h ambulatory blood pressur
e in a Danish population and to study the relationship to casual blood
pressure. Study population A random sample of 2656 Danish men and wom
en participated in a population survey. The participants were selected
in age groups and were aged 41-42, 51-52, 61-62 or 71-72 years during
the survey. Methods Casual blood pressure (standard mercury sphygmoma
nometer) and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (Takeda TM-2421) were meas
ured successfully in 2082 subjects. All subjects under antihypertensiv
e treatment (247) were excluded, restricting the study population to 1
835 participants. Results Casual and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure we
re correlated (P < 0.0001) in all age and sex groups. Casual systolic/
diastolic blood pressures were 129.6 +/- 17.8/82.6 +/- 10.3 for men an
d 125.1 +/- 18.2/79.7 +/- 9.9 mmHg for women. Twenty-four-hour average
blood pressures were 130.8 +/- 14.2/75.3 +/- 8.6 for men and 122.4 +/
- 14.9/69.6 +/- 8.3 mmHg for women. A multivariate linear logistic reg
ression model confirmed that a high casual blood pressure (odds ratios
11/7 for systolic/diastolic blood pressure; P = 0.001) was the major
determinant of a lower ambulatory than casual blood pressure; age and
sex were less important Conclusion The relationship between casual blo
od pressure on the one hand and the difference in casual and 24 h ambu
latory blood pressure on the other hand suggests that ambulatory blood
pressure represents a regression towards the mean compared to casual
blood pressure. Any definition of an upper normal level of 24 h ambula
tory blood pressure that is derived from a correlation between casual
and ambulatory measurements will be inaccurate, and must await long-te
rm studies of the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure and s
ubsequent cardiovascular events. (C) 1998 Lippincott Williams & Wilkin
s.