DIRECT OPHTHALMOSCOPY VERSUS SLIT LAMP BIOMICROSCOPY IN DIAGNOSIS OF THE ACUTE RED EYE

Citation
Df. Anderson et al., DIRECT OPHTHALMOSCOPY VERSUS SLIT LAMP BIOMICROSCOPY IN DIAGNOSIS OF THE ACUTE RED EYE, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 91(3), 1998, pp. 127-128
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
01410768
Volume
91
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
127 - 128
Database
ISI
SICI code
0141-0768(1998)91:3<127:DOVSLB>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The causes of red eye range from trivial to life-threatening, and many general practitioners are uncertain of their ability to diagnose them with the aid of an ophthalmoscope. We tested the hypothesis that, in the assessment of a patient with red eye, a doctor using a slit lamp b iomicroscope would not differ in diagnostic accuracy from a doctor usi ng a direct ophthalmoscope. A cross-over study was conducted in 98 pat ients newly attending an eye casualty department. 71% of diagnoses agr eed exactly, and all potentially sight-threatening lesions were either diagnosed correctly or managed appropriately by doctors using an opht halmoscope. We conclude that the initial diagnosis and management of p atients with an acute red eye is not prejudiced by the lack of a slit lamp biomicroscope.