CALCIPOTRIOL CREAM WITH OR WITHOUT CONCURRENT TOPICAL CORTICOSTEROID IN PSORIASIS - TOLERABILITY AND EFFICACY

Citation
K. Kragballe et al., CALCIPOTRIOL CREAM WITH OR WITHOUT CONCURRENT TOPICAL CORTICOSTEROID IN PSORIASIS - TOLERABILITY AND EFFICACY, British journal of dermatology, 139(4), 1998, pp. 649-654
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology & Venereal Diseases
ISSN journal
00070963
Volume
139
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
649 - 654
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0963(1998)139:4<649:CCWOWC>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
The objectives of the study were to determine whether concurrent treat ment with calcipotriol (50 mu g/g) and either clobetasone 17-butyrate cream (0.5 mg/g) (moderate potency) or betamethasone 17-valerate cream (1 mg/g) (potent) or placebo (vehicle of calcipotriol) was more effec tive and/or caused less skin irritation than calcipotriol cream (50 mu g/g) used twice daily. It was a multicentre, double-blind, parallel g roup study. Patients applied calcipotriol cream in the morning and eit her vehicle (n = 174), calcipotriol (n = 174), clobetasone (n = 175) o r betamethasone creams (n = 176) in the evening for up to 8 weeks. Adv erse events led to withdrawal in 20 patients (2.9%). The mean percenta ge change in PASI (psoriasis area and severity index) was -40.6 in the calcipotriol/vehicle group, -48.3 in the calcipotriol/calcipotriol gr oup, -53.7 in the calcipotriol/clobetasone 17-butyrate group and -57.5 in the calcipotriol/betamethasone 17-valerate group. A statistically significant difference was seen between the four treatment groups (P = 0.006) with calcipotriol/vehicle being less effective than the other treatments. A statistically significant difference in favour of calcip otriol/betamethasone 17-valerate was seen between the calcipotriol/cal cipotriol group and the calcipotriol/betamethasone 17-valerate group. The majority of adverse events were skin irritations, which were repor ted for 31.2% of patients treated with calcipotriol/vehicle, 34.3% of patients treated with calcipotriol twice daily and 23.8% vs. 17.1% of patients treated with calcipotriol/clobetasone 17-butyrate and calcipo triol/betamethasone 17-valerate, respectively. Skin irritation was see n statistically significantly less frequently in patients treated with calcipotriol/clobetasone 17-butyrate or calcipotriol/betamethasone 17 -valerate (P = 0.001), whereas no difference was seen between the othe r groups. In conclusion, calcipotriol applied twice daily was as effec tive as calcipotriol/clobetasone 17-butyrate, but slightly less effect ive than calcipotriol/betamethasone 17-valerate. The incidence of skin irritation was less for patients using concurrent corticosteroids, wh ereas treatment with calcipotriol/vehicle did not reduce the incidence of skin irritation when compared with calcipotriol twice daily.