A. Mercat et al., INVERSE RATIO VENTILATION (I E=2/1) IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME - A 6-HOUR CONTROLLED-STUDY/, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 155(5), 1997, pp. 1637-1642
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
To assess the cardiorespiratory effects of a prolonged application of
inverse ratio ventilation (IRV), we compared IRV (I/E = 2) with conven
tional ventilation (CV) (I/E = 0.5), applied for 6 h each in a randomi
zed order, with constant tidal volume (VT) and total positive end-expi
ratory pressure (PEEPtot) in eight patients with acute respiratory dis
tress syndrome (ARDS). After 1 h, IRV resulted in a lower peak inspira
tory pressure (PIP) (28.2 +/- 1.5 versus 35.6 +/- 1.7 cm H2O, p < 0.05
), an unchanged plateau pressure, and a higher mean airway pressure (M
AP) (17.8 +/- 0.8 versus 15.6 +/- 0.5 cm H2O, p < 0.05) than CV. No si
gnificant difference in Pa-O2 and shunt fraction (Qs/QT) was observed
(83 +/- 7 mm Hg and 40 +/- 4% in CV versus 92 +/- 14 mm Hg and 35 +/-
3% in IRV, respectively). The Pa-CO2 was lower in IRV (48 +/- 3 versus
55 +/- 5 mm Hg, p < 0.05). Cardiac index (CI) and oxygen delivery (Do
(2)) were lower in IRV (3.7 +/- 0.4 L/min/m(2) and 500 +/- 61 ml/min/m
(2) versus 4.6 +/- 0.5 L/min/m(2) and 617 +/- 80 ml/min/m(2), respecti
vely, p = 0.05 for both). Regardless of the considered parameter, no s
ignificant difference was observed between results after 1, 2, 4, and
6 h in each mode. We conclude that IRV at a ratio that results in a si
gnificant intrinsic PEEP does not improve Pa-O2, enhances CO2 eliminat
ion, decreases cardiac output (CO), and does not exert any time-depend
ent effect.