NEW STRATEGIES IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY - IS THERE A ROLE FOR OUTPATIENT ANTIBIOTIC-TREATMENT OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA
M. Karthaus et al., NEW STRATEGIES IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY - IS THERE A ROLE FOR OUTPATIENT ANTIBIOTIC-TREATMENT OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA, Chemotherapy, 44(6), 1998, pp. 427-435
Febrile neutropenia is associated with a significant risk of complicat
ions and mortality. Patients with neutropenia secondary to cytostatic
chemotherapy who develop fever are normally admitted to hospital and t
reated promptly with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Over the last 10 year
s, chemotherapy for solid tumours has been shifting out of the hospita
l setting into the ambit of community-based oncologists, and out-patie
nt treatment with complex multidrug protocols is becoming increasingly
common. In North America high-dose protocols combined with peripheral
blood stem cell transfusion are already being administered on an out-
patient basis. With the increase in the numbers of out-patients underg
oing multidrug chemotherapy, there has been a corresponding rise in th
e severity and duration of neutropenia and in the incidence of associa
ted infections. Patients with neutropenia of short duration (<7 days)
and fever are at a relatively low risk for complications, and in these
circumstances, outpatient antibiotic treatment is an alternative to c
ostly hospitalisation. Drugs, whose antimicrobial coverage and pharmac
okinetics make them particularly suitable for out-patient treatment of
febrile neutropenia, include intravenous and oral quinolones and, for
once-daily dosing, intravenous glycopeptides, ceftriaxone and intrave
nous aminoglycosides. Response rates of 60-95% have been achieved with
such regimens in clinical trials, with hospital admission avoided in
75-95% of the cases. There is no doubt that out-patient treatment impr
oves the quality of life of cancer patients. In Europe, however, there
is a need for randomised clinical trials to support the establishment
of out-patient-based treatment of febrile neutropenia. Out-patient an
tibiotic treatment of febrile neutropenia is still not standard practi
ce, and community-based providers of such treatment must be adequately
equipped and experienced in the management of this condition.