THE USE OF THE ISTAT PORTABLE ANALYZER IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

Citation
Nr. Connelly et al., THE USE OF THE ISTAT PORTABLE ANALYZER IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS, Journal of clinical monitoring, 12(4), 1996, pp. 311-315
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
ISSN journal
07481977
Volume
12
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
311 - 315
Database
ISI
SICI code
0748-1977(1996)12:4<311:TUOTIP>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate the utility of the iSTAT blood analyzer, a beds ide device for hematocrit, sodium, potassium, and glucose measurement during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Methods. Forty patients scheduled for elective CPB were evaluated prospectively. In addition to using t he iSTAT analyzer, blood samples were analyzed at four time points: fo llowing induction of anesthetic, 10 min. after initiation of CPB, 60 m in, after initiation of CPB, and following heparin neutralization by p rotamine. Blood glucose concentration was measured by the hospital lab oratory using a Kodak Analyzer and by a glucose meter, electrolytes we re evaluated by the Kodak Analyzer and BGE (a device which is commonly used for ''satellite laboratory'' determinations of electrolyte and b lood gas results), and hematocrit samples were measured by the hospita l laboratory using an NE 8,000 and a centrifuge. The means and standar d deviations of the differences between the methods were calculated. R esults. The hematocrit values determined by the iSTAT machine, when ad justed for the level of total protein (according to manufacturer's dir ections), differed from the laboratory values by 0.53 +/- 1.46 percent age points. An alternative to measuring total protein and making the a djustment is simply adding 1% to the hematocrit in the pre-CPB period and 3% on-CPB or post-CPB, which we found to yield values that differe d from the laboratory by 0.52 +/- 1.42 percentage points. For all four tests (hematocrit, sodium, potassium, and glucose) the iSTAT had a si milar relationship to the laboratory values as did the other commonly used means (centrifuge, BGE, and glucose meter) of clinical evaluation . Conclusion. In summary, we found that in patients undergoing CPB, th e iSTAT Values agreed sufficiently well with standard laboratory value s and that the iSTAT instrument can be relied upon for bedside measure ments.