S. Dinges et al., COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND VIRTUAL SIMULATION FOR RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING OF MALIGNANT-LYMPHOMA, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 174, 1998, pp. 28-30
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: The exact coverage of the lymph nodes and optimal shielding o
f the organs at risk are necessary for patients with Hodgkin's disease
or malignant lymphoma to guarantee a high cure rate and a low rate of
late effects for normal tissue. The purpose of this study was to comp
are conventional simulation and blocking with virtual simulation in te
rms of coverage of the target volume and shielding of the organs at ri
sk in this highly curative patient group. Patients and Methods: In 10
patients diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease and 5 patients with a Non-Ho
dgkin lymphoma radiation treatment planning for a mantle field or para
-aortic field with inclusion of the spleen was performed in a conventi
onal manner and with virtual simulation. With conventional technique,
irradiation portals were defined during fluoroscopy and shielding of t
he organs at risk was drawn onto the simulation films, based on the in
formation from previous X-ray films, CT or MRI scans. For virtual simu
lation, contouring of the target volumes and organs at risk (e. g. the
kidneys) and the definition of the irradiation portals were performed
with the AcQSim((R)) software package on a VoxelQ((R)) workstation (P
icker Inc.) This was done in a beam's eye view environment on a curren
tly driven CT scan in the treatment position. Both irradiation portals
were compared in terms of coverage of the target volume and shielding
of the organs at risk. Results: Planning of a mantle field in the con
ventional way resulted in an incomplete coverage of the right hilus in
4/15 cases and of the left in 1/15 cases, respectively. The spleen an
d the spleen hilus were not covered completely in 5/15 and 6/15 cases,
respectively. The left kidney was adequately shielded in only two thi
rds (10/15) of the conventionally planned fields. The planning time re
quired for virtual simulation was reduced for the patient, but was inc
reased for the physician because of the more time consuming contouring
procedure compared to conventional simulation. Conclusions: Virtual s
imulation based on CT scans for radiation treatment planning of malign
ant lymphoma gives more information about soft tissue structures than
conventional treatment planning. Therefore, it allows a more precise c
overage of the target volumes and better shielding of the organs at ri
sk. However, the time required for the whole procedure is increased. T
his is justified because of the often highly curative intention when t
reating this group of patients.