Purpose: To assist in the design of quality assurance activities of 3D
treatment planning systems (TPSs), a postal survey has been carried o
ut, addressing TPS users on quality characteristics and their relative
importance in clinical routine planning. Material and Methods: The ap
proach as described in ISO/IEC 9126 has been used to analyze TPS quali
ty. Both TPS quality characteristics and how these may be used to esta
blish a quality model are included. A questionnaire on ranking of thes
e TPS quality characteristics has been sent out to the German DEGRO me
mbers in February 1997. Results: By the end of July 1997, 90 individua
l assessments (of 45 physicists, 35 physicians, and 10 radiographers)
had been collected. On an importance scale from 1 (very important) to
6 (unimportant), weight factors of 1.71 (portability), 2.84 (maintaina
bility), 3.18 (efficiency), 3.85 (usability), 4.52 (functionality) and
4.90 (reliability) have been determined from the data. From user sati
sfaction data also obtained from the questionnaire responses, baseline
quality indices could be established from the quality model for the R
TPs Cadplan, TMS Helax, and Voxelplan. Conclusion: The responses highl
ight the need for TPS quality assurance at the same time along the lin
es of safety-related, research-oriented, and interactive end-user soft
ware systems in radiotherapy treatment planning. Quality assurance act
ivities must take this into account. Their effect can be monitored by
using quality indices as derivable from the established quality model.