A conflict arises when some groups interpret a siting as a possibility
while others see it as constituting a risk. The actors involved are f
aced with various problems regarding decisionmaking. What, for the gov
ernment, can be a solution to an environmental problem can be seen by
the people living in the area in question as a threat to their health
and immediate environment. This article discusses the possibility of c
reating a dialogue between various actors involved in a siting conflic
t. It is stated that the dialogue should be democratic and based on kn
owledge: siting has political dimensions, and therefore it is importan
t that citizens have the possibility of participating in the decision-
making process. In addition, by allowing several different perspective
s to influence a siting decision, more knowledge is created about the
proposal. In conclusion, the paper gives some general advice concernin
g how such a dialogue can be brought about. A dialogue can fail, but t
he chance of a good solution increases if a dialogue is encouraged to
proceed.