Jv. Carnahan et C. Marsh, COMPARATIVE LIFE-CYCLE COST-ANALYSIS OF UNDERGROUND HEAT DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS, Journal of transportation engineering, 124(6), 1998, pp. 594-605
An analytical model was developed to compare the life-cycle costs of t
wo types of underground heat distribution systems: directly buried con
duits and concrete trench installations. The costs of initial construc
tion, routine maintenance, operation, repair, and replacement are repr
esented in the model. Comparisons are made to explore the influence of
failure rates, heat loss assumptions, the discount rate, and the poli
cy on partial section replacement. Failure rate estimates are obtained
from the literature and also from survey results obtained by the U.S.
Army. Life-cycle cost computations indicate that, when initial constr
uction costs are the same, concrete trench installations have a cost a
dvantage of $18-$42 per foot over buried steel conduit when other cost
components are taken into account over a 25-year lifetime. The cost a
dvantage of concrete trench over fiberglass reinforcement plastic (FRP
) buried systems is $32-$133 per foot. The variation in the cost advan
tage reflects the variation in the estimate of the failure rate for bu
ried steel and FRP systems. Routine maintenance was crucial for the bu
ried systems to avoid dramatic increases in operation and replacement
costs that would make the cost advantage of concrete trench installati
on even greater than stated above. In contrast, the low incidence of f
ailure associated with concrete trench systems made their life-cycle c
osts relatively insensitive to maintenance policy.