TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATION BY THE HUMAN ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR SUBTYPE BETA (ER-BETA) STUDIED WITH ER-BETA AND ER-ALPHA RECEPTOR CHIMERAS

Citation
Em. Mcinerney et al., TRANSCRIPTION ACTIVATION BY THE HUMAN ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR SUBTYPE BETA (ER-BETA) STUDIED WITH ER-BETA AND ER-ALPHA RECEPTOR CHIMERAS, Endocrinology, 139(11), 1998, pp. 4513-4522
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
Journal title
ISSN journal
00137227
Volume
139
Issue
11
Year of publication
1998
Pages
4513 - 4522
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-7227(1998)139:11<4513:TABTHE>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
We have studied the two estrogen receptor (ER) subtypes, ER alpha and ER beta, and chimeric constructs with ER alpha and ER beta to examine the bioactivities of these receptors and their responses to estrogen a nd antiestrogen ligands. Transcriptional activity of ER beta is highly dependent on cell/promoter context and on the nature of the ligand. E R beta activated significant levels of transcription in response to es trogens in certain cell types, but showed only moderate activity compa red with ER alpha in others. Antiestrogens such as tamoxifen and 2-phe nylbenzofuran, which show some agonistic activity with ER alpha, exhib it no agonistic activity with ER alpha. Alteration of the amino-termin al A/B receptor domain can result in a dramatic change in cell type- a nd ligand-specific transcriptional activity of ER beta. Upon replacing the A/B domain of ER beta with the A/B domain of ER alpha, this recep tor chimera not only exhibits an improved transcriptional response to estrogens, but also is now able to activate transcription upon treatme nt with these antiestrogens. As antiestrogen agonism was lacking in ER beta and the ER beta/alpha chimera containing the amino-terminal A/B domain of ER beta fused to domains C through F of ER alpha, but was re stored in an ER alpha/beta chimera containing the AIB domain of ER alp ha, antiestrogen agonism was shown to depend on the A/B domain (activa tion function-l-containing region) of ER alpha. Together, these result s indicate that the differences in the amino-terminal regions of ER al pha and ER beta contribute to the cell and promoter-specific differenc es in transcriptional activity of these receptors, and their ability t o respond to different ligands, thus providing a mechanism for differe ntially regulated transcription by these two ERs.