One of the potential problems in stock-enhancement programs is the dis
ruption of local adaptation that may occur when native gene pools unde
rgo introgression with alien genotypes. Evidence for local adaptation
in fishes, however, comes almost entirely from freshwater and anadromo
us species. In marine species, where geographic barriers to gene flow
are usually absent, certain life stages are highly dispersive and/or m
igratory, and populations are few,the opportunity for local adaptation
would appear to be comparatively low. I argue that such a conclusion
is premature because few marine species have been rigorously tested fo
r local adaptation. Patterns of variation observed in nature, whether
based on phenotypic or neutral molecular characters, are not predictor
s of the pattern in fitness-related traits across environmental gradie
nts, which may contain hidden (e.g., countergradient) genetic variatio
n. The Atlantic silverside, Menidia menidia, for example, shows extens
ive evidence of local adaptation even though life-history and allozyme
analyses would predict otherwise. Knowledge of local adaptation does
not necessarily preclude stock enhancement and may, in fact, improve t
he chances for its success, but care to avoid introgression is necessa
ry. Hatcheries can be important tools for establishing the existence o
f adaptive differences in life-history and other traits among stocks,
because they provide controlled environments where the genetic contrib
ution to phenotypic variation can be measured. If viewed as both resea
rch and production facilities, marine hatcheries could contribute grea
tly to our understanding of natural populations.