Ch. Forrest et al., MEDULLARY CARCINOMA OF THE THYROID - ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSIS BY FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY, CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 84(5), 1998, pp. 295-302
BACKGROUND. A preoperative diagnosis of medullary carcinoma of the thy
roid (MCT) allows for the investigation of associated multiple endocri
ne neoplasia/pheochromocytoma, and definitive surgery without the need
for frozen section. Criteria for cytodiagnosis are well known but var
iable patterns of presentation may cause diagnostic difficulty. METHOD
S. This study examines the accuracy of cytodiagnosis and the value of
ancillary tests in 17 patients seen between 1976 and 1997. Nine patien
ts underwent thyroid gland aspirations, five patients underwent fine-n
eedle aspiration (FNA) of the thyroid and cervical lymph nodes, and th
ree patients underwent cervical lymph node aspiration alone. Electron
microscopy (EM) of aspirated material was performed in nine cases and
immunocytochemistry in two cases. RESULTS. In all cases the diagnosis
was suggested by FNA. In four cases, diagnosis and management were bas
ed on cytology alone. EM of FNA material was confirmatory in nine case
s, two of which also showed positive calcitonin immunocytochemistry. I
n three cases the diagnosis was not proven until surgical resection, a
nd in one case FNA confirmed lymph node metastasis in known MCT. Froze
n section in five patients did not change the level of diagnostic conf
idence over the FNA diagnosis in any case. In four other thyroid tumor
s (one Hurthle cell follicular carcinoma, two anaplastic carcinomas, a
nd one hyperplastic nodule) MCT was suspected in the FNA differential
diagnosis but later excluded. In the Hurthle cell tumor immunoperoxida
se staining was positive for calcitonin and in one anaplastic carcinom
a, a neuroendocrine phenotype was suggested. In the latter case, addit
ional EM excluded MCT. CONCLUSIONS, Although correct diagnosis is made
by cytology in the majority of instances, other tumors may show cytol
ogic findings similar to MCT. EM of FNA material was found to be the m
ost definitive method of proving or excluding MCT. Immunocytochemistry
may be misleading for rarely performed tests. Cancer (Cancer Cytopath
ol) 1998;84:295-802. (C) 1998 American Cancer Society.