Jl. Mainardi et al., LOW-RATE OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE COLONIZATION IN AMBULATORY AND HOSPITALIZED HIV-INFECTED PATIENTS IN A HOSPITAL UNIT - A PROSPECTIVE SURVEY, The Journal of infection, 37(2), 1998, pp. 108-111
Objective: to determine the frequency of Clostridium difficile carriag
e in HIV-infected in- and out-patients, and to assess the role of this
carriage in nosocomial transmission of C, difficile. Patients and met
hods: prospective study in a university hospital. Forty-five consecuti
ve HIV-infected out-patients and 120 hospitalized patients (52 HIV and
68 non HIV-infected-patients) were studied. During the period of hosp
italization, 44 patients (24 HIV and 20 non-HIV-infected patients) wit
h a negative culture within 48h of admission were followed weekly for
fecal carriage. Clostridium difficile culture and latex agglutination
were performed on the fecal samples of each patient, In the case of po
sitive culture and/or latex agglutination, C. difficile toxin assays w
ere performed by microtitre cytotoxicity method.Results: out-patients:
one patient was a carrier and one patient with diarrhoea was infected
with a toxigenic strain (2/45, 4,5%, 95% CI=1-17), Eighty percent of
the HIV-infected out-patients had received antimicrobial agents previo
usly In-patients: in the first 48h, live asymptomatic patients were ca
rriers (three non-HIV and two HIV-infected patients). Among 20 patient
s who complained of diarrhoea, one HIV-infected patient had only a pos
itive latex agglutination and one HIV-infected patient was infected wi
th a toxigenic strain. Overall, 7/120 (5.8%, 95% CI = 2-10) patients w
ere infected or colonized with C, difficile. During the hospitalizatio
n (743 patient-days), none of the 44 patients acquired C. difficile. C
onclusion: this study suggests that in this given unit, C. difficile c
arriage is low, at least with single room accommodation, and in the ab
sence of clusters of cases. This carriage is not different in HIV and
non-HIV infected patients despite treatment with multiple antibiotics,
and is not different in patients managed in different care environmen
ts, The systematic identification of C. difficile carriers for isolati
on and prophylactic treatment is not useful under these circumstances.