Wg. Rossmanith et C. Grasshof, IS OPIOIDERGIC ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CIRCADIAN VARIATION OBSERVED IN THE GONADOTROPIN RESPONSIVENESS OF EARLY FOLLICULAR PHASE WOMEN, Clinical endocrinology, 49(4), 1998, pp. 499-503
OBJECTIVES In women, the gonadotrophin response to gonadotrophin-relea
sing hormone (GnRH) displays a circadian rhythm during the early folli
cular phase (EFP), with GnRH-stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) and f
ollicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) release found to be markedly decreas
ed at night, Since the opioidergic inhibition of gonadotrophin secreti
on is selectively enhanced at night, we reasoned that the circadian ch
anges in the gonadotrophin responsiveness to GnRH might be related to
a nocturnal increase of opioidergic activity. STUDY DESIGN Eleven wome
n with normal menstrual cycles were studied in the EFP on four differe
nt occasions in random order. Studies were conducted either during the
day (0900-1300 h) or at night (2100-0100h). During these times, GnRH
(25 mu g i.v,) was administered in conjunction with either saline las
control) or naloxone (4 mg i.v.). MEASUREMENTS Frequent blood samples
were obtained before and after GnRH stimulation for determination of b
asal sex steroid and gonadotrophin concentrations by immunoradiometric
assays. RESULTS While oestradiol levels were comparable (P>0.3) at al
l times, progesterone concentrations were significantly (P<0.01) highe
r during day than during night hours, with no difference between contr
ol and naloxone conditions, Gonadotropin responses to GnRH stimulation
were not significantly different between day and night times, nor did
they vary between control and naloxone conditions. CONCLUSIONS Opioid
ergic blockade imposed by naloxone did not noticeably change GnRH-stim
ulated gonadotrophin release at any of the study times, We therefore i
nfer that mechanisms other than a nocturnal increase of opioidergic in
hibition may account for eventual circadian changes in the gonadotroph
in responsiveness of early follicular phase women.