Ll. Dumenco et al., THE RESULTS OF DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES FOR THROMBOPHILIA IN A LARGE GROUP OF PATIENTS WITH A PERSONAL OR FAMILY HISTORY OF THROMBOSIS, AJCP. American journal of clinical pathology, 110(5), 1998, pp. 673-682
The range of tests used in the evaluation of thrombophilia has been al
tered by the recent recognition of common genetic defects predisposing
to thrombosis such as factor V-Leiden (FVR506Q), enzyme deficiencies
causing hyperhomocysteinemia, and improvement in the sensitivity and u
tilization of assays for antiphospholipid antibodies. In this study, t
he outcomes of laboratory evaluation of 402 patients with thrombophili
a were reviewed and correlated with clinical data. A predisposing fact
or was present (positive diagnosis, group A) in 110 patients (27%), th
e test results of 111 patients (28%) could not be definitively interpr
eted (equivocal results, group B) and the test results of 181 (45%) we
re normal (group C). The median age of the group A patients was 48 yea
rs (range, 3.7-88 years), suggesting that evaluation of patients over
the age of 50 is worthwhile. Of the 110 patients in group A, 84% had s
ingle defects and 16% had combined defects. The most common defect was
factor V-Leiden (44 patients). Equal numbers of patients presenting w
ith arterial and venous thromboses were evaluated Patients with arteri
al events were less likely to have a definable laboratory defect (33 o
f 132 [25%]) than were chose with venous events (50 of 136 [37%]). Fac
tor V-Leiden was the most frequent finding in patients with venous eve
nts, and lupus anticoagulant or anticardiolipin antibodies were the mo
st frequent findings in patients with arterial events. Positive diagno
ses were made in patients on anticoagulants, indicating that this shou
ld not preclude investigation. Our study confirms the need for thoroug
h evaluation to assess thrombotic risk, and it reflects the impact of
newly identified thrombophilic disorders on the expected outcome of la
boratory evaluation for thrombophilia.