The aim of the treatment of hypertensive disease is to reduce its asso
ciated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Simply reducing blood p
ressure levels is clearly not adequate since its impact on coronary he
art disease is particularly unsatisfactory. Moreover, the beneficial e
ffects of antihypertensive treatment seem to plateau for several years
, and the incidence of cardiac and renal failure is even increasing. T
herefore, recommendations by groups of national or international exper
ts are periodically updated on the basis of current epidemiological da
ta. Two such recommendations appeared in 1997, one from the Agence Nat
ionale d'Accreditation et d'Evaluation en Sante (ANAES) in France and
the other from the Joint National Committee (JNC) on Prevention, Detec
tion, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, in the United S
tates. Both advocate the use of lifestyle modifications in all patient
s. The threshold blood pressure level at which pharmacological therapy
is introduced largely depends on associated cardiovascular risk facto
rs and/or involvement of target organs. The JNC recommends a particula
rly low threshold in patients with diabetes. Pharmacological treatment
is usually initiated with a single drug. The choice of any one drug d
epends on the patient profile and takes into consideration such charac
teristics as age and associated risk factors or comorbidity. Some repr
esent a contraindication for certain therapeutic classes (for example,
asthma for P-blockers, renovascular hypertension for ACE inhibitors),
while others are a specific or even 'compelling' indication (heart fa
ilure, angina, renal disease, peripheral vascular disease etc.). This
patient profiling is very precisely described in the new recommendatio
ns. However, any such single drug therapy provides adequate blood pres
sure control in no more than about 50 to 60% of patients. When the pat
ient does not respond to the drug used or experiences side effects, su
bstitution of a drug from another pharmacological class is recommended
. In contrast, if the patient is a responder but blood pressure remain
s above the target level, it is preferable to add a second drug from a
class offering complementary action. The use of a combination therapy
allows blood pressure control in more than 80% of patients. More auth
ors are suggesting that combination therapy as first-line treatment ma
y increase the number of responders and reduce the impact of counter-r
egulatory effects occurring with single drug therapy (e.g. sodium rete
ntion, or sympathetic activation). This alternative strategy is now ac
knowledged in the recommendations.