ESTIMATION OF THE DOMINANCE VARIANCE FOR POSTWEANING GAIN IN THE US LIMOUSIN POPULATION

Citation
N. Gengler et al., ESTIMATION OF THE DOMINANCE VARIANCE FOR POSTWEANING GAIN IN THE US LIMOUSIN POPULATION, Journal of animal science, 76(10), 1998, pp. 2515-2520
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
Journal title
ISSN journal
00218812
Volume
76
Issue
10
Year of publication
1998
Pages
2515 - 2520
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(1998)76:10<2515:EOTDVF>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The objective of this study was to estimate the dominance variance for postweaning gain in Limousin cattle. Data included 215,326 records of postweaning gain from 205 to 365 d, provided by the North American Li mousin Foundation. Parental dominance subclasses were formed and relat ed using the method of Hoeschele and VanRaden. Variance components wer e estimated using Method R based on six samples of 50%. Fixed effects in the model included contemporary group apd covariates for inbreeding and breed composition (percentage Limousin). Heterozygosity was negat ively correlated with breed composition (< -.99) and was therefore not included in the model. Two types of contemporary groups used as origi nal groups from the National Cattle Evaluation were partially based on breed composition. Original contemporary groups that were too homogen eous for breed composition were replaced by herd-year-sex classes. Two models were used with the two data sets. Model 1 contained the fixed effects described above and an additive genetic effect. Model 2 Includ ed a dominance effect in addition to the effects contained in Model 1. In total, four combinations of contemporary group x model were used. Dominance variance was computed as being four times the estimated pare ntal subclass variance. Estimates for inbreeding depression and breed composition (percentage Limousin) were all small and not greatly affec ted by inclusion of dominance effects or changes in contemporary group s. Estimates of the additive variance (expressed as percentage of the phenotypic variance) were only slightly affected, with values between 20 and 21%. Dominance estimates were highly affected when passing from original (10%) and to alternative contemporary groups (18%). Such lar ge values may indicate that dominance is important for postweaning gai n. Results showed the advantage of an individual dominance approach ba sed on sire-dam combinations; therefore, expected gains through the us e of specific combination ability as a part of the mating selection cr iteria for growth might be high.