Local contact stresses at the bone-cement interface are thought to pla
y an important role in the initiation of component loosening. A reduce
d-modulus bone cement can lower these local contact stresses. The visc
oelastic properties of such a cement raised the question of long term
subsidence of the implant system. In this study, the viscoelastic prop
erties of a reduced-modulus bone cement were compared with standard po
lymethylmethacrylate, PMMA, bone cement using stress relaxation tests.
Unconstrained stress relaxation tests were performed at 37 degrees C
in an aqueous environment by applying 1%, 2.5%, and 5% strains on bone
cement specimens and monitoring the diminishing load for 100 h. The i
nitial rapid stress relaxation occurring over the first hour and the s
teady state stress relaxation occurring between 15 and 100 h were anal
yzed. A fast stress diminution occurred in PBMMA specimens indicating
that, in a total hip arthroplasty application, PBMMA bone cement would
transfer the stress quickly and distribute it over a larger area of e
ndosteal bone surface. Steady state stress relaxation experiments show
ed a significant difference in 2.5% and 5% stress relaxation values (P
< 0.05) between PMMA and PBMMA specimens, but not at the 1% stress va
lues. Length measurements indicated that the viscoelastic PBMMA specim
ens demonstrated little recovery after 100 h of imposed strain whereas
the elastic PMMA specimens showed substantial recovery. This seems to
indicate relatively larger subsidence rates in unconstrained PBMMA sp
ecimens compared to PMMA specimens. In vivo, the cement is surrounded
by endosteal bone at the outer side and by an implant on the inner sid
e. Therefore, constrained creep tests are necessary to obtain the data
required for an assessment of in vivo subsidence. (C) 1998 Elsevier S
cience Ltd. All rights reserved.