In the global quest for improved 'quality' in health care, the purely
clinical quality of health care should not be confused with the qualit
y of the health care experience. Although the former is central to the
latter, it is the latter that determines the overall quality of a hea
lth system. Americans have long had trouble with this crucial distinct
ion. A survey of several distinct dimensions of the quality of the ent
ire health care experience, for example, can help to explain why the t
echnically sophisticated, expensive and often very luxurious American
health system tends to earn relatively low scores in cross-national su
rveys in which respondents are asked to rate the overall quality of th
eir health system. Many useful insights can undoubtedly be had from th
e system's myriad experiments with continuous improvements in the clin
ical quality of health care (just as Americans, however, could learn f
rom similar experiments abroad). On the other hand, the bewildering an
d ethically dubious financial and managerial systems that Americans ha
ve put in place to foster continuous quality improvement in their heal
th care may be self-defeating in the end. Policy analysts and policy m
akers in other countries may learn from the American experience to spa
re their citizens the agony.