The politics of the Asian crisis is analysed on the national, regional
and global level. On the national level the financial crisis quickly
led to a legitimacy crisis for the responsible governments, notably in
the countries most badly hit: Thailand, South Korea and Indonesia. A
reasonably smooth transition to new governments and policies in Thaila
nd and South Korea demonstrated the advantage of having a democratic s
ystem. In the longer run, however, there may be an anti-democratic bac
klash should democratic governments be unable to get their countries o
ut of the crisis. On the regional level, the crisis led to paralysis.
It has demonstrated the weakness of Japan's position in the region, an
d shown that regional organisations are unable to take significant ini
tiatives in a crisis situation. From a regional security perspective t
here has been a shift of power from the non-Chinese to the Chinese sta
tes, but the crisis has also strengthened the leverage of the US and p
ut a temporary halt to the challenge from 'Asian values'. On the globa
l level, the crisis has reinforced US confidence in its own economic m
odel, and has allowed the IMF to play an assertive political role both
in relation to individual governments and to fora such as the G8. The
crisis has demonstrated the need for institutional reform on the glob
al level in order to create multilateral institutions with sufficient
clout to prevent a highly liberalised global economy from entering a c
ycle of booms and crises in the same way national economies used to do
in the past. But can such organisations be democratic?