CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF ECHOCONTRAST ENHANCEMENT IN NEUROSONOLOGY - AIM OF THE STUDY

Citation
Dg. Nabavi et al., CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF ECHOCONTRAST ENHANCEMENT IN NEUROSONOLOGY - AIM OF THE STUDY, Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie, 66(10), 1998, pp. 466-473
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology",Psychiatry
ISSN journal
07204299
Volume
66
Issue
10
Year of publication
1998
Pages
466 - 473
Database
ISI
SICI code
0720-4299(1998)66:10<466:COEEIN>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
To evaluate the potential and limitations of echocontrast enhancement using Levovist(R) in a non selected consecutive cohort of neurological patients with insufficient native ultrasound investigations. Methods: In 91 patients an indication for echocontrast application was seen af ter an insufficient extracranial (n =17), transtemporal (n = 54), and transforaminal (n = 20) Doppler- und color-coded Duplex sonography. Le vovist(R) was injected at a concentration of 400 mg/ml and 200-400 mg/ ml for the transcranial and extracranial approach, respectively. The e ffect of the echocontrast enhancement was assessed semiquantitatively with respect to signal enhancement, imaging quality, and diagnostic co nfidence. Results: In a total of 83 patients (91%) the signal enhancem ent led to a moderate to high imaging quality allowing to reach 67 def inite neurovascular diagnoses (74%). In subgroup analysis, the amount of sufficiently confident examinations was significantly higher for th e transtemporal and transforaminal (both 80%) than for the extracrania l approach (47%). The latter was mostly due to artificial signals deri ved from adjacent neck vessels. Conclusion: Levovist(R) constitutes a safe and highly effective diagnostic tool especially for the transtemp oral and transforaminal neurosonographical imaging. By means of a diff erentiated application of echocontrast agents, its cost-effectiveness can be increased and the need for other potential invasive and expansi ve neuroimaging methods can be further reduced.